FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: Jacob Szeto
T: 503.242.0900
F: 503.242.3822
According to Recovery.gov, the U.S. government’s official website for data related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, Oregon has a total of nine new congressional districts. That’s eight more than Oregon is projected to have after the 2010 census.
These nine phantom Congressional districts include: 00, 14th, 8th, 16th, 60th, 21st, 6th, 36th and 39th.
The national stimulus has awarded Oregon $1,853,303,183, which, according to the government, has saved or created 9,653 jobs for Oregonians. These phantom districts have managed to create or save 15 jobs seemingly out of thin air. All it will cost taxpayers is $4.9 million dollars, or $326,624 per job. The 60th Congressional district actually created zero jobs with $206,710 of stimulus funds.
Source: http://www.recovery.gov/Pages/TextView.aspx?data=stateSummaryAllCD&statecode=OR
Oregon is not alone with these phantom districts. Bill McMorris of Watchdog.org reports that a total of $6.4 billion has gone to 440 phantom districts across the nation.
According to reporter Michael Noyes of the Montana Policy Institute, Ed Pound, the director of communications for the Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board, said there are no plans to correct these errors until the next reporting cycle.
“People make errors, and we’ve found people are making errors in these reports,” said Ed Pound. “Our job is data integrity, not data quality.”
I would also point out Greg Walden’s District 5, the only republican district in the state got nothing. And we want these partisan people running health care? Please!
So, let me get this straight. I am to believe data quality has nothing to do with data integrity? If you receive data exactly as it was sent, even if gibberish, that is, indeed, integrity but it is certainly not quality! By that notion, if some one tells Mr. Ed Pound something, Mr. Pound does not care about the facts of what he heard, only that he heard it correctly. Perhaps this is correct for the Director of Communications whose job is to oversee the quality of what is being communicated with the quality of what is being sent. However, someone superior to him has to be the judge of the veracity of the communication!
Hmm … Please explain the difference between data integrity & data quality, and why Mr. Pound would not be considered about quality …