Day: April 2, 2021

Portland City Council’s Shelter to Housing Continuum-cm

Vlad Yurlov, Policy Analyst at Cascade Policy Institute, provided testimony on Portland City Council’s Shelter to Housing Continuum

Via email
March 30, 2021

Portland City Council,

I’m Vlad Yurlov, policy analyst at Cascade Policy Institute. It’s time to free all residential development from design review.

Since 2015, Portland has been operating under consecutive housing emergencies. Under the emergency declarations, the city has expedited the design review process for affordable housing. The Shelter to Housing Continuum you are now considering would exempt outdoor shelters from design review.

I am glad that the City Council has recognized design review as one of the key roadblocks to increasing the supply of housing in Portland. Design review does not just stand in the way of supplying affordable housing and shelter for our homeless residents. Design review stands in the way of providing market rate housing too. I urge City Council to go further and remove design review requirements for all residential development in Portland.

As the Council knows, the design review process adds delays, expenses, and confusion to all types of housing, not just affordable housing and shelter for homeless residents. The delays, expenses, and confusion that affect residential developments are a key reason for Portland’s continuing affordability and homelessness crisis.

Design review for residential developments typically takes between 42 and 90 days. That’s up to three months that could have been spent building more housing units. These burdens apply to the City’s affordable housing bond projects as well. Developers are left to appeal to the subjective whims of Portland’s design commission.

I hope you remember Landon Crowell’s proposed development at 1122 SE Ankeny Street. Starting in 2016, Crowell spent an absurd 18 months and $200,000 in fees trying to meet the design commission’s demands. Even after the commission agreed the project was consistent with Portland Zoning Code, Crowell was denied his right to supply Portland with more housing. The design commission’s main concern was that building in accordance with “development standard allowances” was incompatible with the unique lot that Crowell had to work with. In September 2017, Portland City Council unanimously overturned the design review commission’s decision and allowed Crowell to build.

Read Blog Detail
Press Release Oregons Legislature Seeks to Give up Taxpayer Bargaining Power-cm

Press Release: Oregon’s Legislature Seeks to Give up Taxpayer Bargaining Power

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
April 2, 2021

Cascade Policy Institute
4850 SW Scholls Ferry Rd., Ste. 103
Portland, OR 97213
503-242-0900

Contact:Vlad Yurlov
vlad@cascadepolicy.org

Say your roof is leaking and you call a roofer for a quote. If they say “I’ll have to charge you the highest rate in the region” before saying hello, you’d probably just hang up. Oregon’s leaky roof is infrastructure spending. Instead of hanging up the phone, Oregon’s legislators may force every contractor to charge your tax dollars the highest rates on every public works project, by signing House Bill 2491 or Senate Bill 493.

A prevailing wage is the rate of pay that contractors must offer their employees on public works projects such as highway repair, affordable housing construction, and public school improvements. Oregon’s prevailing wages are currently calculated through independent wage surveys conducted by the state’s labor commissioner. Instead, HB 2491 and SB 493 would tie prevailing wages to the highest wages in collective bargaining agreements.

On March 25th, Oregon Representative Peter DeFazio told the federal House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee that Americans are “tired of potholes, they’re tired of detours, failed bridges, [and] congestion….” All of these problems are rampant in Oregon, and they’ll only get worse under the new prevailing wage proposals. Nonetheless, Oregon’s legislature is teeing up HB 2491 and SB 493, which would only make it more difficult to meet infrastructure needs on a controlled budget.

Oregon should learn from its northern neighbor before adopting the same kind of language. In 2018, Washington voted to tie prevailing wages to the highest wages of union contracts in their regions.

The Association of Washington Housing Authorities reported, “As a result of this legislation, prevailing wages for residential trades saw dramatic increases that have put in peril some affordable housing projects and weatherization programs.” Furthermore, Washington’s government affairs director of Associated General Contractors pointed out that one contract representing less than 13% of the total operator hours in the region was able to dictate wages for the other 87%. The result of tying prevailing wages to the highest collective bargaining agreement in the region destroyed the concept of prevailing wages, because “prevailing” implies some sort of prevalence. If Oregon follows in Washington’s footsteps, expect similar results.

ECONorthwest studied the impact of Washington’s policy and projected the effect of similar legislation on Oregon’s affordable housing projects. After applying Washington’s wage spikes, ECONorthwest estimated that a newly constructed 200-unit affordable housing project in Oregon would cost about 10% more.

The Oregon School Boards Association is also warning Oregon’s legislature. Public school districts use bonds to fund improvements that are considered public works. On behalf of OSBA, Lori Sattenspiel told the House Business and Labor Committee that “this bill could push bond project costs up significantly….” Aging schools and COVID-related projects would all be caught in a “perfect storm.”

Cascade Policy Institute policy analyst Vlad Yurlov says, “If HB 2419 or SB 493 pass, the Legislature will paint taxpayers into a corner. Public infrastructure will be in demand, but if the prevailing wage is always tied to the highest collective bargaining agreement, the price of the infrastructure will continue to outpace government budgets. Taxpayers will have to cover the additional expenses whether they want to or not.”

Oregonians are lucky that Washington experimented with sending the prevailing wage on an unlimited upward spiral a few years ago. Now, our legislators must learn from the mistakes and avoid the same pitfalls. The evidence clearly shows that tying prevailing wages to the highest collective bargaining agreement is a problem that we don’t need to bear. Transportation infrastructure, affordable housing, and schools are expensive enough as it is. Oregon legislators should vote no on HB 2419 and SB 493.

Founded in 1991, Cascade Policy Institute is Oregon’s free-market public policy research center. Cascade’s mission is to explore and promote public policy alternatives that foster individual liberty, personal responsibility, and economic opportunity. For more information, visit cascadepolicy.org.

###

Read Blog Detail