Christina Martin

Intel announced this week that it will bring almost 7,000 new jobs to Oregon by expanding in Hillsboro. That is 7,000 individuals who will be paying taxes and spending money in Oregon. This is unusually good news in this time of economic trouble and high unemployment.

 But why did Intel choose Oregon when it could build anywhere? Especially when certain Oregon taxes are significantly higher than taxes in many other states. Intel has a number of special tax deals with the state of Oregon and local governments that allow it to keep a competitive edge in a world marketplace. It gets special tax exemptions on much of its property and equipment. Furthermore, most of its income is also exempt from Oregon’s corporate taxes because the company sells most of its products outside of the state. Yet, even many who a year ago claimed that Oregon’s businesses aren’t paying their “fair share” will be encouraged by today’s news. That’s because 7,000 private sector jobs will breathe fresh life into the area.

 But why should Intel get special treatment? The same low taxes that encouraged Intel to build here in Oregon also would encourage other businesses to come or to stay here.  Government can best “create” jobs by getting out of the way. Low taxes and a stable regulatory environment allow entrepreneurs to do what they do best – creating jobs and products that consumers value.


 Christina Martin is Director of the Asset Ownership Project at Cascade Policy Institute, Oregon’s free market public policy research organization.

 

2 Responses to “Intel-ligent Stimulus”

  1. Creed Brattain October 22, 2010 at 1:34 pm #

    I have a business in Oregon with locations in 5 cities. I don’t get the break that Intel is getting and that fact alone doesn’t bother me. Why? Because a WAG could possibly mean maybe $3,000,000 in personal income taxes would be paid to the state by those newly employed and there would be a huge infusion of personal spending by those people that would benefit the other businesses in our state.

  2. Kevin Wheeler November 4, 2010 at 4:56 am #

    Has any analysis been done on the impact of incentives offered Large national and multinational corporations to land in Oregon compared to the same kind of incentives that may be offered to home grown (in state)business?

Leave a Reply

Other Publications by Christina

Parent Power – Oregon’s Open Enrollment Law Puts Parents and Children First

Christina Martin | March 7, 2012
The 2012-2013 school year will be the first year that the new statewide open enrollment law takes effect. The new law (HB 3681) allows Oregon ...  read more

What does Oregon’s new open enrollment law mean for your child?

Christina Martin | February 15, 2012
WHAT THE LAW DOES The new statewide open enrollment law will take effect in the 2012–2013 school year. The new law allows Oregon parents to ...  read more

Testimony to House Committee on unemployment accounts

Christina Martin | January 31, 2012
Click here to listen to the testimony. Christina Martin’s testimony to the House Interim Committee on Business and Labor starts at 41:00.   Co-Chair Garrett, ...  read more

More On These Topics

Insolvency, One Step at a Time

John Charles | May 16, 2012
The Oregonian on Sunday examined TriMet’s deteriorating finances and called attention to high-cost union contracts, first approved in 1994, as the starting point of the ...  read more

Rescue Children from Our Burning Public School System

Steve Buckstein | May 9, 2012
Newark, New Jersey Mayor Cory Booker is a larger-than-life figure fighting for what he calls the “Most Important Civil Right of All – equal access ...  read more

Portland – the city that works (over consumers)

Steve Buckstein | May 2, 2012
The slogan “Keep Portland Weird” was reinforced recently when the city threatened to fine two local companies a total of $895,000 for—get this—offering to charge ...  read more