Karla Kay Edwards

Throughout the Northwest, even a small timber sale is rarely completed without first being challenged by a citizen’s lawsuit filed by an environmental organization. These lawsuits, with legal fees from both sides typically paid by taxpayers, have stifled the management of our public lands. Billions of private and tax dollars are spent by private entities and government agencies to defend sound management decisions that may or may not have been tripped up by technical errors or missed deadlines.

Eric Hoffer once said, “Every great cause begins as a movement, becomes a business and then a racket.” Citizen lawsuits are the critical tool that has allowed the environmental movement to become a racket. According to research done by Budd-Falen Law Offices from 2003-2007, more than $4.7 billion were paid to environmental law firms by federal agencies using our tax dollars.

No recourse exists for private or government agencies that win in court to recoup their costs. The answer to this problem isn’t simply to eliminate citizen lawsuits. The answer is either to eliminate the ability of the plaintiff to recover legal costs or to require the plaintiff to pay impact fees to the private entity or community for delays that resulted due to the lawsuit if they lose. Either way, the plaintiff will have some skin in the game and will think hard about using this shotgun approach to litigation.

Karla Kay Edwards is Rural Policy Analyst at Cascade Policy Institute, Oregon’s free market public policy research organization. She has held positions of leadership in numerous organizations focusing on agricultural and rural industries and issues, including the Fresno (California) Farm Bureau, Washington Cattlemen’s Association and the Oregon Department of Agriculture.

 

One Response to “The Citizen Lawsuit Racket”

  1. Anonymous February 13, 2010 at 11:21 am #

    Well . . It is no secret that The legal system loves all these lawsuits.They get extra money and stay busy that way.
    The practice has become a pig lard siphon of tax coffers.
    The way it got started was in the late 80′s , after the cold war ended . . . Mikael Gorbachev had 10,000 Russian lawyers imbed into the American legal system and intentionally jam the courts with this junk science bullshit.Gorbachev moved to San Francisco and runs his Green International from the Presidio Hotel.
    The cold war never did end . . . they just told us it was over.
    It simply changed venue . . the court room.

    The plan is to destroy the economy of the U.S. so that it will be dependant on foreign imports controlled by them.

Leave a Reply

Other Publications by Karla

Rural Freedom Project- Juniper Entrepreneur

| May 15, 2012
Gerard Joseph Lebreque talks with Cascade Policy Institute about his struggles with regulations on juniper and his life in rural Oregon. SEE THE VIDEO.  read more

Karla discusses Alberta’s Bill 36 on CAEPLA Connections in Canada – Part 2

Karla Kay Edwards | July 11, 2011
Click here for Part 1 On July 2, 2011, Karla continued discussion with CAEPLA CONNECTIONS LANDOWNER TALK RADIO about an Alberta land use law similar ...  read more

Karla discusses Alberta’s Bill 36 on CAEPLA Connections in Canada – Part 1

Karla Kay Edwards | July 11, 2011
Click here for part 2 On June 25, 2011, Karla visited with CAEPLA CONNECTIONS LANDOWNER TALK RADIO about an Alberta land use law similar to ...  read more

More On These Topics

Bill Post interviews Sarah Ross on a need for competition in education

KYKN radio host, Bill Post spoke with Cascade Communications Coordinator Sarah Ross on Thursday to discuss the evolution of technology and a need for competition ...  read more

Bill Meyer talks with Steve Buckstein about right to work in education

Steve Buckstein | May 18, 2012
KMED host Bill Meyer spoke with Cascade Senior Policy Analyst Steve Buckstein about the philosophy of right to work, education unions, and the Eagle Point ...  read more

Insolvency, One Step at a Time

John Charles | May 16, 2012
The Oregonian on Sunday examined TriMet’s deteriorating finances and called attention to high-cost union contracts, first approved in 1994, as the starting point of the ...  read more