Testimony before the House Committee on Health Care

February 4, 2010

Chair Greenlick and members of the Committee, my name is Steve Buckstein. I’m Senior Policy Analyst and founder of Cascade Policy Institute, a Portland-based research center that promotes individual liberty, personal responsibility and economic opportunity in Oregon. 

On a philosophical level, I object to defining health care as a right, or more precisely, what philosophers call a “positive” right. This country was founded on the belief that government cannot create rights; it can at best protect our inalienable rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. These so-called “negative” rights don’t put demands on anyone else; except the demand that no one violate them.

On a practical level, creating a positive right to health care would create an obligation on the part of some people to pay for it, and an obligation on the part of other people to provide the actual health care services. These obligations actually violate the rights of these individuals. 

On a political level, I understand that government tries to grant such rights all the time. In this case, passing this constitutional amendment will make some people feel good. It says that we care deeply about the uninsured, but it only gives intellectual lip service, if that, to the matter of future costs.

Define health care as a fundamental right and cost control will go out the window – witness the public school system and how the Quality Education Model
demands spending increases that likely won’t result in any quality improvement.

I can almost see the just-around-the-corner Quality Health Care Model defining prototype health clinics, with mandated staffing levels, required tests, etc. Innovation will become mired in bureaucratic process.

Rather than spend precious political capital trying to create an artificial right to health care, I suggest we spend that capital finding practical ways to drive health care costs down and quality up.  Make it easier for more people to afford health care on their own by getting un-needed mandates and insurance regulation out of the way. Make insurance premiums for everyone tax deductible, not just for employers. Then, if you decide that some people still can’t afford it, take a page from the food stamp book, or other such programs where you simply subsidize health care purchases for low-income people. That will distort the economics far less than the route you’re trying to embark on here today.

### 

Hearing audio is here.  Buckstein testimony begins at 01:39:05.

 

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. My Experience of Not Having Health Insurance for Many Years | Student Dental Insurance - February 5, 2010

    [...] Cascade Policy Institute – Oregon Public Policy » Testimony in opposition to HJR 100 reg… [...]

Leave a Reply

Other Publications by Steve

Press Release: Cascade Policy Institute Report predicts 110,000 jobs for Oregon with enactment of a Right-to-Work Law

| February 2, 2012
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE February 2, 2012 Contact: Steve Buckstein Senior Policy Analyst & Co-Founder Cascade Policy Institute Office Phone: 503-242-0900 E-Mail: steven@cascadepolicy.org Cascade Policy Institute Report ...  read more

Cascade’s School Choice Beginnings

Steve Buckstein | January 24, 2012
Why is school choice such an important part of Cascade Policy Institute’s agenda? Partially, because it is the issue that got us started back in ...  read more

Three Strikes and You’re Out: Replacing Top-Down Education Control with School Choice

Steve Buckstein | January 19, 2012
In his recent State of the State address, Governor John Kitzhaber argued that legislators must “lock in” his education system changes so they then can ...  read more

More On These Topics

New Report: The Right to Work Is Right for Oregon

Randall Pozdena | January 31, 2012
The Right to Work Is Right for Oregon: A Comprehensive Analysis of the Economic Benefits from Enacting a Right-to-Work Law By Randall Pozdena, Ph.D. and ...  read more

Testimony to House Committee on unemployment accounts

Christina Martin | January 31, 2012
Click here to listen to the testimony. Christina Martin’s testimony to the House Interim Committee on Business and Labor starts at 41:00.   Co-Chair Garrett, ...  read more

The Oregon Education Investment Board: Top Down on Steroids

Steve Buckstein | December 6, 2011
The recent firing of University of Oregon President Richard Lariviere has unleashed strong feelings on both sides. While he was officially fired by the Oregon ...  read more
You might also like...
State Board of Education Continues to Look at Virtual Charter School Issue