Karla Kay Edwards

Oregon is a leader in the “buy local food” movement, and buying fresh produce from local farmers’ markets and community supported agriculture (CSA) could become an even stronger trend in our state. People not only want to know where their food is coming from, but they also like the fact that they are supporting the local rural economy.

Unfortunately, Oregon’s onerous land-use regulations stand in our farmers’ way. Oregon has an arbitrary rule requiring a piece of property zoned as high-value farmland to generate $80,000 in annual sales before a dwelling can be built for the farmer. More than 83% of all farms in Oregon generate less than $50,000 in sales annually. Many farmers participating in farmers’ markets and CSA are small farmers who often have off-farm jobs in addition to farming. They produce perishable commodities like tomatoes and strawberries that must be watered and harvested daily, so it is an extreme burden on them and their families if they are not allowed to live on the property they farm. This hardship often results in farmers deciding to let the land sit fallow.

Oregonians need to demand that this $80,000 rule be repealed. People should have the right to live on the land they own and the opportunity to generate income for themselves and commerce for their local communities.

 

One Response to “$80,000 to Live on Your Own Farm?”

  1. J Adams June 13, 2011 at 1:08 am #

    Who put such a law on the books in Oregon? When did this become law?
    For what purpose was this $80,000 rule supposed to accomplish

    I am a small farmer and live on my property at present. I have only been a
    farmer since I retired in 2000 so have not been up-to-speed on farm issues.

    My farm is only 17 acres. Some apples, blueberries, and weeds. The wife is a
    organic food person so she has all the land being prepared for “organic growing”.

    It takes a great deal of time and energy to grow organic as the weeds are all pulled
    by hand. If we did not live here or very near to the farm it would not be worth the
    trouble.

    Thank You for the time you take to keep us famers informed.

    Best regards

    J Adams

Leave a Reply

Other Publications by Karla

Karla discusses Alberta’s Bill 36 on CAEPLA Connections in Canada – Part 2

Karla Kay Edwards | July 11, 2011
Click here for Part 1 On July 2, 2011, Karla continued discussion with CAEPLA CONNECTIONS LANDOWNER TALK RADIO about an Alberta land use law similar ...  read more

Karla discusses Alberta’s Bill 36 on CAEPLA Connections in Canada – Part 1

Karla Kay Edwards | July 11, 2011
Click here for part 2 On June 25, 2011, Karla visited with CAEPLA CONNECTIONS LANDOWNER TALK RADIO about an Alberta land use law similar to ...  read more

An Open Letter to President Obama

Karla Kay Edwards | June 27, 2011
Dear President Obama: Your recognition of the importance of rural America is appreciated, but it appears shallow thus far in your presidency. The announcement of ...  read more

More On These Topics

Christina Martin talks with Victoria Taft about Government Anesthesia

Christina Martin | January 17, 2012
Listen to Christina Martin as she talks with Portland radio host, Victoria Taft, about school choice and its parallels to health and pain. Christina Martin ...  read more

Christina Martin talks with Victoria Taft on Control Cometh Before the Fall of Education

Christina Martin | January 11, 2012
Christina Martin talks with Victoria Taft on her latest commentaries about control in education and starting the new year by cutting red tape! Christina Martin ...  read more

Cut the Red Tape: Give the Economy a Fresh Start in 2012

Christina Martin | January 4, 2012
Americans live in a regulatory minefield. Consider the tens of thousands of statutes, regulations, and court precedents that affect nearly every aspect of your life: ...  read more
You might also like...
Tax Policy and the Oregon Economy:The Effects of Measures 66 and 67