Bill Conerly
I estimate that raising the maximum tax rates on personal income, including capital gains, to eleven percent will cost the Oregon economy 36,000 jobs by 2015. The job losses will continue to accumulate beyond that year. This analysis does not incorporate job losses due to higher corporate income taxes.

The estimate is based on a model of state employment growth that incorporates data for all 50 states for 26 years. It exploits tremendous variation in tax practices from one state to another, and within individual states across time. The model was developed for my 2005 analysis of Oregon’s capital gains tax. (See “Generating Jobs and Income Through a Capital Gains Tax Reduction,” Appendix 1, Equation 3, available at http://www.conerlyconsulting.com/pdf/Capital_Gains_Report.pdf.)

The higher tax rates on wage income and capital gains cause a small reduction in annual growth rates. Although the first-year job cost is relatively small, 5,570 jobs, the losses accumulate year after year because the economy’s growth rate-not just the number of jobs but the growth rate-is permanently reduced. My estimate begins with the official state economic forecast published by the Office of Economic Analysis (Oregon Economic and Revenue Forecast, May 15, 2009). The official forecast is then adjusted to reflect the lower employment growth indicated by my tax impact model.

A “common sense” explanation of the impact is simple. People in America choose where to live and where to invest. There is always a small number who are considering moving. There are also some people considering larger investments or smaller investments. Higher tax rates induce some of these people to live outside of Oregon or to invest less in Oregon.


Dr. Conerly is an economic consultant and Chairman of the Board of Cascade Policy Institute.

 

5 Responses to “Taxing the “Wealthy” More Will Cost 36,000 Oregon JobsBy Bill Conerly”

  1. Thomas January 26, 2010 at 12:20 pm #

    Oregon is economics challenged. Just as the private market sector absolutely needs as many dollars as possible, the government again takes for it’s non-job creating commitments. How much of this money going to PERS? What about all those self employed contractors who’ve taken a huge hit during this recession. They can’t even qualify for unemployment insurance. Oh well, who gives a damn. Certainly not the state government. Piss on them.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Cascade Policy Institute - Oregon Public Policy » Two Job-Killer bills threaten to destroy ten to twenty times more jobsthan Oregon’s so-called “stimulus package” has created - June 24, 2009

    [...] Taxing the “Wealthy” More Will Cost 36,000 Oregon Jobs By Bill Conerly [...]

  2. Cascade Policy Institute - Oregon Public Policy » Two Job-Killer bills threaten to destroy 100 TIMES more jobs than Oregon’s so-called “stimulus package” will create - August 5, 2009

    [...] Taxing the “Wealthy” More Will Cost 36,000 Oregon Jobs By Bill Conerly [...]

  3. Cascade Policy Institute - Oregon Public Policy » Debunking Tax Increase Claims - November 4, 2009

    [...] studies of these two specific measures find that the personal tax increase will cost the state over 30,000 jobs, and the corporate tax increase will cost the state over 40,000 [...]

  4. Cascade Policy Institute - Oregon Public Policy » Cascade Policy Institute Stands by Economic Analysisof Job Losses due to Measures 66 and 67 - December 1, 2009

    [...] he did on another tax four years ago. Nothing in the Center’s report dealt with his current analysis, which found that some 30,000 jobs will be lost if Measure 66, the personal income tax increase, [...]

Leave a Reply

Other Publications by Bill

More On These Topics

New Report: The Right to Work Is Right for Oregon

Randall Pozdena | January 31, 2012
The Right to Work Is Right for Oregon: A Comprehensive Analysis of the Economic Benefits from Enacting a Right-to-Work Law By Randall Pozdena, Ph.D. and ...  read more

Testimony to House Committee on unemployment accounts

Christina Martin | January 31, 2012
Click here to listen to the testimony. Christina Martin’s testimony to the House Interim Committee on Business and Labor starts at 41:00.   Co-Chair Garrett, ...  read more

Subsidized Car Sharing: The Next Frontier in Wasteful Spending

John Charles | January 18, 2012
Nine months ago I happily testified (twice) on behalf of a legislative bill that would allow the creation of a privately operated car sharing program ...  read more
You might also like...
State Board of Education Continues to Look at Virtual Charter School Issue