I drive a car. Odds are, you do too. In fact, given the choice between the MAX, bus or car, 97% of Portland residents choose to drive every day. Why then did Metro unanimously vote to extend the MAX to Milwaukie at a cost of $1.4 billion, including a new $340 million downtown bridge without car lanes?
Even granting TriMet’s very generous estimate of 20,000 riders per day on the new line, that money could instead buy each person a brand new 2009 Corvette with gas and insurance for five years. A Corvette or the MAX, which would you choose?
In a city which prides itself on its mass transit system, why do so many Portlanders choose to drive? Let’s go back to the basics. As every fifteen-year-old is well aware, a car allows the driver to go anywhere at any time. Cars are engines of freedom.
Forget the MAX, forget buses, forget bikes. Life is complicated, and time is scarce. The MAX is an amusing toy train, but in the real world, Portlanders value the freedom to drive wherever they want whenever they want.
Given the choice, I would pick the Corvette over the MAX. It’s too bad that Metro isn’t giving anyone a choice.
© 2008, Cascade Policy Institute. All rights reserved. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is hereby granted, provided the author and Cascade Policy Institute are cited. Contact Cascade at (503) 242-0900 to arrange print or broadcast interviews on this topic. For more topics visit the QuickPoint! archive.
Let’s see, a corvette for 5 years, or a fixed transit line likely to last 100+ years? Easy choice.
Thank you for your comment, but it misses the point. Assuming full ridership and ticket sales every day of the year, it would take 48 years to pay off the initial $1.4 billion alone, not to mention the day-to-day operating costs. Would you really invest any of your hard-earned money in a venture with no possible return for at least half a century? Why should the other 99% of Portlanders who will never ride the new line make that investment? That is an easy choice.