Introduction

During the past decade, Portland-area planners have embraced Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) as the region’s dominant land use/transportation strategy. They assert that TOD, especially based on light rail, will reduce traffic congestion, increase transit use, and make neighborhoods more livable. Transit-oriented development is generally defined as compact, mixed-use development that concentrates retail, housing and jobs in neighborhoods well-served by public transit. TOD has become so important to local planners that it is now the primary justification for expansion of Portland’s light rail system. Rail advocates concede that light rail is not worth the cost if it is built only as a transit system.

Dozens of TODs have been constructed in the Portland region since 1990, with several winning national acclaim. Most have received public subsidies, on the assumption that the public benefits of TOD outweigh the costs. However, little is known about how transitoriented projects actually perform in terms of transit use and any correlated reduction in auto dependency. The purpose of this paper—the second in a series of Cascade Policy Institute TOD case studies—is to help fill in that gap.


—> View the full PDF document


About the author: Michael L. Barton, Ph.D., is an academic advisor with Cascade Policy Institute.

About Cascade Policy Institute: Founded in 1991, Cascade Policy Institute is Oregon’s premier policy research center. Cascade’s mission is to explore and promote public policy alternatives that foster individual liberty, personal responsibility and economic opportunity. To that end, the Institute publishes policy studies, provides public speakers, organizes community forums and sponsors educational programs.

Cascade Policy Institute is a tax-exempt educational organization as defined under IRS code 501(c)(3). Cascade neither solicits nor accepts government funding and is supported by individual, foundation and business contributions. Nothing appearing in this document is to be construed as necessarily representing the views of Cascade or its donors, or as an attempt to aid or hinder the passage of any bill before any legislative body. The views expressed herein are the author’s own. Copyright 2006 by Cascade Policy Institute. All rights reserved.

 
Categories: Reports
Tags:

Other Publications by

“We Have a Year to Figure out How to Violate Our Consciences”

Kathryn Hickok | February 9, 2012
“Never before has the federal government forced individuals and organizations to go out into the marketplace and buy a product that violates their conscience,” stated ...  read more

Testimony in opposition to SB 1581 before the Senate Committee on Education and Workforce Development

Steve Buckstein | February 8, 2012
Opposing More Top-Down Control of Oregon Education Chair Hass, Co-Chair Morse, and members of the Committee, my name is Steve Buckstein. I’m Senior Policy Analyst ...  read more

Why Oregonians Deserve the Right to Work

Steve Buckstein | February 6, 2012
The twenty-two states that have not required workers to join a union and pay union dues have enjoyed, as a group, more rapid employment and ...  read more

More On These Topics

Why Oregonians Deserve the Right to Work

Steve Buckstein | February 6, 2012
The twenty-two states that have not required workers to join a union and pay union dues have enjoyed, as a group, more rapid employment and ...  read more

Press Release: Cascade Policy Institute Report predicts 110,000 jobs for Oregon with enactment of a Right-to-Work Law

Cascade Policy Institute | February 2, 2012
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE February 2, 2012 Contact: Steve Buckstein Senior Policy Analyst & Co-Founder Cascade Policy Institute Office Phone: 503-242-0900 E-Mail: steven@cascadepolicy.org Cascade Policy Institute Report ...  read more

New Report: The Right to Work Is Right for Oregon

Randall Pozdena | January 31, 2012
The Right to Work Is Right for Oregon: A Comprehensive Analysis of the Economic Benefits from Enacting a Right-to-Work Law By Randall Pozdena, Ph.D. and ...  read more
You might also like...
The Nanny State Attack on BPA: Oregon and Beyond