Last week Cascade released a report encouraging cities and counties to consider leaving TriMet due to its financial mismanagement.

TriMet has long admitted that its labor costs are unsustainable. In addition, the agency’s addiction to costly rail construction has cannibalized bus service, which has been cut by 14% in the past five years.

Comparison with other local transit districts paints a stark picture. The cost per mile of operation for the TriMet commuter rail line is $43.74. TriMet’s flagship service, light rail, costs $11.96 per mile. Yet, the small city of Sandy runs its own bus service for $2.57 per mile.

TriMet predicts that additional service cuts will be required by 2017 and every year thereafter to balance the budget, which essentially would shut down the agency by 2025. TriMet’s only strategy has been to seek contract concessions from the bargaining unit representing most workers, but this is unlikely to succeed. The ongoing PERS crisis shows that once management agrees to expensive fringe benefits for unionized workers, it’s almost impossible to reduce them later.

TriMet is in a death spiral of its own making. Local jurisdictions might be hoping for the best, but they should plan for the worst. Leaving TriMet is an option that needs to be on the table.

John A. Charles, Jr. is President and CEO of Cascade Policy Institute, Oregon’s free market public policy research organization. 

 

2 Responses to “As TriMet Sinks, Should Portland Suburbs Go Down With the Ship?”

  1. Jared January 17, 2014 at 5:31 pm #

    Tri-Met and others act like buses are so bad, but the problem with rail lines is that they can only go certain place, and where they are chosen to go is critical. Thus, people who are forced to use public transit do not have a choice about where to go. I ride the MAX nearly daily, and often there are mishaps, but the train cannot reroute, and it’s a logistical nightmare. Buses can reroute, and they do not require such expensive infrustructure. It’s a shame that buses get stigmatized by ignorant people who probably don’t even take public transit.

    Additionally, the behavior on the MAX can be quite bad, especially east of the Gateway/99th transit stop.

  2. Bob Clark January 18, 2014 at 9:09 am #

    I wonder if TriMet’s managers haven’t actually nefariously adopted a “Too-Big-to-Fail” strategy so as to get a mega-sized State bailout.

Leave a Reply

 

Other Publications by John

Press Release – Should Charities Be Required to Disclose the Names of Donors?

| June 12, 2015
June 12, 2015 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Media Contact: John A. Charles, Jr. 503-242-0900 john@cascadepolicy.org Should Charities Be Required to Disclose the Names of Donors? PORTLAND, ...  read more

Event Video – Do Citizens Have a Right to Privacy in Charitable Giving?

| June 9, 2015
Cascade Policy Institute hosted a debate on the topic of donor privacy versus donor disclosure at the Multnomah Athletic Club in Portland on June 1, 2015. ...  read more

Is It Possible to Power an Export Facility Entirely by Renewable Energy?

John Charles | May 27, 2015
The Portland Sustainability Commission recently recommended that the City Council approve a $500 million propane export facility proposed by Pembina Pipeline Corporation. However, as part ...  read more

More On These Topics

Does PCC-Sylvania Need a Light Rail Tunnel?

By Emma Newman Metro and TriMet are jointly considering an expansion of the light rail system to PCC-Sylvania in SW Portland, by building a tunnel ...  read more

U.S. Sees Huge Growth in Homeschooling

Kathryn Hickok | May 29, 2015
What does it mean for parents and kids today? The Center for Education Reform reports that since 2003, the number of homeschooled kids in the ...  read more

Event Video - Aging Roads? New Ideas!

Cascade welcomed transportation expert Adrian Moore, Ph.D., Vice President of Policy for Reason Foundation, at a special event at Multnomah Athletic Club on April 29, ...  read more