Recently, the governors of New York and New Jersey sent a joint letter to Congressional leaders expressing their outrage that the “fiscal cliff” legislation did not include more than $50 billion in federal aid for damages caused by Hurricane Sandy. Although the federal aid is likely to be approved by mid-January, this minor delay was deemed an outrage by the two governors, who said: “When American citizens are in need we come to their aid. That tradition was abandoned in the House last night.”

In fact, the real American tradition has been to help neighbors recover through voluntary aid and private investment. Prior to about 1964, most Americans would have been dumbstruck at the attitude of politicians who think federal taxpayers “owe” them billions of dollars in relief. Apparently, federal disaster relief is now another entitlement program, along with Social Security, Medicaid, and food stamps.

Since I have friends and family living in Manhattan, I certainly feel for those whose homes have been destroyed by Sandy, and I’m willing to help financially if asked politely. But when elected officials start acting like spoiled teenagers and “demand” that I turn over part of my income for their constituents, I feel a lot less charitable.

John A. Charles, Jr. is President and CEO of Cascade Policy Institute, Oregon’s free market public policy research organization.

 

2 Responses to “Federal Relief Aid Is the New Entitlement”

  1. Toni January 19, 2013 at 4:28 am #

    Thank you for your comments, John. I live in Josephine County, where 47% of our residents feel “entitled” to some kind of govt assistance. Many of them are third-generation “entitleds” and complain when the assistance is not given quick enough. Living off the govt has become a way of life for some people, and the rest of us are getting pretty tired of footing the bill. My grandparents, who lived through the Depression, would not have considered taking govt assistance.

  2. Michael Wagoner January 22, 2013 at 1:07 am #

    I have to agree with your assessment. While it is natural and correct to feel badly for those who have suffered loss from a natural disaster, those people are not automatically entitled to immediate compensation.
    This is just another example of entitlement thinking trumping all other thinking when the funds are coming from “someone else” (either taxes or borrowing).

Leave a Reply

 

Other Publications by John

Portland Set to Approve Public Shaming of Building Owners

John Charles | April 8, 2015
For members of the Portland City Council, the end always justifies the means. Their current obsession is energy use in commercial buildings. On April 15 ...  read more

If the state loses $1.4 billion for schools and nobody notices, did it really happen?

John Charles | March 30, 2015
The Oregon legislature is in the midst of its biennial quest for more public school funding. Advocates are so desperate for cash that they are ...  read more

TriMet’s Great Disappearing Act

John Charles | March 18, 2015
During the 2003 session of the Oregon State Legislature, TriMet sought an increase in the regional payroll tax rate. In public testimony, TriMet General Manager ...  read more

More On These Topics

America’s 2015 Tax Bill? It’s 31% of the Work Year

Kathryn Hickok | April 15, 2015
Tax Freedom Day arrives this year on April 24, six days later than it was two years ago. Tax Freedom Day is a calendar-based measure ...  read more

Oregon’s Minimum Wage Debate: Disadvantaged Youth Are Crucial Issue

Bill Conerly | April 13, 2015
The Oregon legislature is considering raising the minimum wage over the next few years from $9.25 per hour to as much as $15. What the ...  read more

Government-Imposed Minimum Wage Increases Don’t Work for Oregon Small Businesses

Steve Buckstein | April 10, 2015
The concept that everyone should earn at least some government-mandated minimum wage is politically very appealing. It’s almost the classic example of taking from the ...  read more