Recently, the governors of New York and New Jersey sent a joint letter to Congressional leaders expressing their outrage that the “fiscal cliff” legislation did not include more than $50 billion in federal aid for damages caused by Hurricane Sandy. Although the federal aid is likely to be approved by mid-January, this minor delay was deemed an outrage by the two governors, who said: “When American citizens are in need we come to their aid. That tradition was abandoned in the House last night.”

In fact, the real American tradition has been to help neighbors recover through voluntary aid and private investment. Prior to about 1964, most Americans would have been dumbstruck at the attitude of politicians who think federal taxpayers “owe” them billions of dollars in relief. Apparently, federal disaster relief is now another entitlement program, along with Social Security, Medicaid, and food stamps.

Since I have friends and family living in Manhattan, I certainly feel for those whose homes have been destroyed by Sandy, and I’m willing to help financially if asked politely. But when elected officials start acting like spoiled teenagers and “demand” that I turn over part of my income for their constituents, I feel a lot less charitable.

John A. Charles, Jr. is President and CEO of Cascade Policy Institute, Oregon’s free market public policy research organization.

 

2 Responses to “Federal Relief Aid Is the New Entitlement”

  1. Toni January 19, 2013 at 4:28 am #

    Thank you for your comments, John. I live in Josephine County, where 47% of our residents feel “entitled” to some kind of govt assistance. Many of them are third-generation “entitleds” and complain when the assistance is not given quick enough. Living off the govt has become a way of life for some people, and the rest of us are getting pretty tired of footing the bill. My grandparents, who lived through the Depression, would not have considered taking govt assistance.

  2. Michael Wagoner January 22, 2013 at 1:07 am #

    I have to agree with your assessment. While it is natural and correct to feel badly for those who have suffered loss from a natural disaster, those people are not automatically entitled to immediate compensation.
    This is just another example of entitlement thinking trumping all other thinking when the funds are coming from “someone else” (either taxes or borrowing).

Leave a Reply

 

Other Publications by John

The Elliott State Forest Should Be an Asset―Not a Liability―for Oregon Schools

John Charles | October 13, 2014
By Jordan Lofthouse, Randy Simmons, and John A. Charles, Jr. With Oregon’s schools constantly facing budget crises, why are our lawmakers missing out on the ...  read more

Time for a “New Business Model” for the Elliott State Forest

John Charles | October 8, 2014
Oregon’s political leaders have the chance to do what they frequently ask of the state legislature: provide more money to Oregon’s schools. So why aren’t ...  read more

Report Shows Possibilities for Elliott State Forest to Make Money for Oregon Schools

John Charles | October 1, 2014
Today, the Cascade Policy Institute released a report analyzing the range of policy options for turning the Elliott State Forest from a liability into an ...  read more

More On These Topics

Dissing Online Education

Steve Buckstein | October 15, 2014
One can imagine that blacksmiths and buggy whip makers didn’t take kindly to the automobile revolution that started in the late 19th century. Those at ...  read more

Time for a “New Business Model” for the Elliott State Forest

John Charles | October 8, 2014
Oregon’s political leaders have the chance to do what they frequently ask of the state legislature: provide more money to Oregon’s schools. So why aren’t ...  read more

It’s Time to Change Our Failed Federal Lands Policy

Cascade Policy Institute | October 7, 2014
In 1976, Congress changed its “policy” regarding our public lands (Federal Lands Policy Management Act, or FLPMA). This “policy” change sought to retain public lands ...  read more