Recently, the governors of New York and New Jersey sent a joint letter to Congressional leaders expressing their outrage that the “fiscal cliff” legislation did not include more than $50 billion in federal aid for damages caused by Hurricane Sandy. Although the federal aid is likely to be approved by mid-January, this minor delay was deemed an outrage by the two governors, who said: “When American citizens are in need we come to their aid. That tradition was abandoned in the House last night.”

In fact, the real American tradition has been to help neighbors recover through voluntary aid and private investment. Prior to about 1964, most Americans would have been dumbstruck at the attitude of politicians who think federal taxpayers “owe” them billions of dollars in relief. Apparently, federal disaster relief is now another entitlement program, along with Social Security, Medicaid, and food stamps.

Since I have friends and family living in Manhattan, I certainly feel for those whose homes have been destroyed by Sandy, and I’m willing to help financially if asked politely. But when elected officials start acting like spoiled teenagers and “demand” that I turn over part of my income for their constituents, I feel a lot less charitable.

John A. Charles, Jr. is President and CEO of Cascade Policy Institute, Oregon’s free market public policy research organization.

 

2 Responses to “Federal Relief Aid Is the New Entitlement”

  1. Toni January 19, 2013 at 4:28 am #

    Thank you for your comments, John. I live in Josephine County, where 47% of our residents feel “entitled” to some kind of govt assistance. Many of them are third-generation “entitleds” and complain when the assistance is not given quick enough. Living off the govt has become a way of life for some people, and the rest of us are getting pretty tired of footing the bill. My grandparents, who lived through the Depression, would not have considered taking govt assistance.

  2. Michael Wagoner January 22, 2013 at 1:07 am #

    I have to agree with your assessment. While it is natural and correct to feel badly for those who have suffered loss from a natural disaster, those people are not automatically entitled to immediate compensation.
    This is just another example of entitlement thinking trumping all other thinking when the funds are coming from “someone else” (either taxes or borrowing).

Leave a Reply

 

Other Publications by John

Equal Outcome Is the Wrong Goal

John Charles | January 14, 2015
In Governor Kitzhaber’s final inaugural address this week, he focused on the themes of equality and community. Specifically, he wants to reduce the gap between ...  read more

No Wonder Portland Can’t Afford to Maintain Streets

John Charles | December 31, 2014
The Portland City Council seems determined to raise taxes to pay for street maintenance. But the City doesn’t have a revenue shortage problem; it has ...  read more

Report Shows No Return on Public Investment for Oregon Wave Energy Trust

John Charles | December 19, 2014
PORTLAND, Ore. – A new report released by Cascade Policy Institute concludes that the public-private partnership Oregon Wave Energy Trust has failed to achieve a ...  read more

More On These Topics

2015’s Forward-Looking Celebration of School Choice

Kathryn Hickok | January 21, 2015
Next week is National School Choice Week. Every January, National School Choice Week highlights the need for effective educational options for all children “in a ...  read more

Equal Outcome Is the Wrong Goal

John Charles | January 14, 2015
In Governor Kitzhaber’s final inaugural address this week, he focused on the themes of equality and community. Specifically, he wants to reduce the gap between ...  read more

The Regime Trembles at the Sight of a Smartphone

Steve Buckstein | January 6, 2015
“The regime trembles at the sight of a smartphone.”* That quote comes from Portland-based independent journalist and world traveler Michael J. Totten. One might guess ...  read more