Recently, the governors of New York and New Jersey sent a joint letter to Congressional leaders expressing their outrage that the “fiscal cliff” legislation did not include more than $50 billion in federal aid for damages caused by Hurricane Sandy. Although the federal aid is likely to be approved by mid-January, this minor delay was deemed an outrage by the two governors, who said: “When American citizens are in need we come to their aid. That tradition was abandoned in the House last night.”

In fact, the real American tradition has been to help neighbors recover through voluntary aid and private investment. Prior to about 1964, most Americans would have been dumbstruck at the attitude of politicians who think federal taxpayers “owe” them billions of dollars in relief. Apparently, federal disaster relief is now another entitlement program, along with Social Security, Medicaid, and food stamps.

Since I have friends and family living in Manhattan, I certainly feel for those whose homes have been destroyed by Sandy, and I’m willing to help financially if asked politely. But when elected officials start acting like spoiled teenagers and “demand” that I turn over part of my income for their constituents, I feel a lot less charitable.

John A. Charles, Jr. is President and CEO of Cascade Policy Institute, Oregon’s free market public policy research organization.


2 Responses to “Federal Relief Aid Is the New Entitlement”

  1. Toni January 19, 2013 at 4:28 am #

    Thank you for your comments, John. I live in Josephine County, where 47% of our residents feel “entitled” to some kind of govt assistance. Many of them are third-generation “entitleds” and complain when the assistance is not given quick enough. Living off the govt has become a way of life for some people, and the rest of us are getting pretty tired of footing the bill. My grandparents, who lived through the Depression, would not have considered taking govt assistance.

  2. Michael Wagoner January 22, 2013 at 1:07 am #

    I have to agree with your assessment. While it is natural and correct to feel badly for those who have suffered loss from a natural disaster, those people are not automatically entitled to immediate compensation.
    This is just another example of entitlement thinking trumping all other thinking when the funds are coming from “someone else” (either taxes or borrowing).

Leave a Reply


Other Publications by John

Oregon Scraping Bottom in State Integrity Rankings

John Charles | November 11, 2015
This week the Center for Public Integrity released a report grading the 50 states on governance. The metrics used to measure integrity included the categories ...  read more

Portland Worries About Homelessness, While Metro Makes Housing Less Affordable

John Charles | October 28, 2015
The Portland City Council has decided to allocate $20 million to solve a perceived crisis with “homelessness” and another $67 million to subsidize “affordable housing.” ...  read more

Is TriMet Better Off Than Greece?

John Charles | October 7, 2015
Syndicated financial writer Malcolm Berko recently advised a small investor to stay away from Greek bonds or securities. He wrote, “Greece has morphed into a ...  read more

More On These Topics

Educational Savings Accounts: The “Smartphones” of Parental Choice

Kathryn Hickok | November 18, 2015
Yesterday the Senate Interim Education Committee of the Oregon Legislature held an informational hearing on Educational Savings Accounts, or ESAs. The focus of the hearing ...  read more

Get Oregon out of the Liquor Business

Steve Buckstein | November 4, 2015
There are still eighteen so-called “control states” in America that exert substantial control over the sale of liquor. Oregon is one of them, virtually monopolizing ...  read more

Assaulting “Corporate Profits” Will Hit Average Oregonians

Steve Buckstein | October 28, 2015
A union-backed group is planning to put an initiative on Oregon’s 2016 General Election ballot that would result in the largest tax increase in Oregon ...  read more