Buy atenolol without prescription, By James L. Huffman, Order discount atenolol online, JD
Associate editor of The Oregonian Susan Nielsen says that Governor Kitzhaber and the legislature face a parent rebellion if they don’t figure out how to reduce class sizes pronto. (“Big classes, fed-up families: As Kitzhaber plans for later, atenolol for order, parents ask about now, Buy atenolol no rx, ” November 11). Nielsen is surely right that today’s parents won’t wait for the new top-down education bureaucracy while it studies how to educate tomorrow’s kids.
But Nielsen’s reference to “a tiny support staff” as part of the problem is puzzling in light of a recent report, buy atenolol from india, entitled “The School Staffing Surge: Decades of Employment Growth in America’s Public Schools.” The report provides a state-by-state accounting of the growth in public school enrollment and employment since 1950. Some will be suspect of the report because it is published by the pro-school-choice Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice, buy atenolol without prescription. Order cheap atenolol online, But the data all comes from the National Center for Education Statistics at the U.S. Department of Education, so it warrants attention, online pharmacy atenolol.
The bottom line for the nation is that, Atenolol from india, between 1950 and 2009, public school employment growth has outstripped public school enrollment growth by a factor of four. In other words, buy atenolol internet, student enrollment has increased by 96 percent, Atenolol without rx, and total public school staffing has increased by 386 percent. Buy atenolol without prescription, Between 1992 and 2009 the numbers look a little better, but personnel growth still out-stripped student growth 39 percent to 17 percent.
What are all of these new public school employees doing. A significant number of them are teachers, buying generic atenolol. Between 1950 and 2009 student enrollment roughly doubled, Atenolol price, while the number of teachers increased by 252 percent. Between 1992 and 2009 the growth rates were 17 percent for students and 32 percent for teachers. One would expect that with student-teacher ratios declining from 27.5 in 1950 to 15.4 in 2009, there would be a significant improvement in student achievement, buy atenolol without prescription. But no―according to the National Assessment of Educational Progress, atenolol cheap price, reading scores have declined and math scores have remained level over the past two decades. Certified atenolol,
Even more revealing is the change in pupil-staff (as opposed to pupil-teacher) ratio. It was 19.3 in 1950 and 7.8 in 2009. While student enrollment increased 96 percent, atenolol vendors, non-teaching administrative and support staff increased 702 percent. Buy atenolol without prescription, The authors of the report estimate that if non-teaching personnel had grown at the same rate as student enrollment and the number of teachers had grown “only” 1.5 times as fast as enrollment, the nation’s public schools would have an additional $37.2 billion to spend each year. Canadian atenolol, That’s enough to give every public school teacher in the nation an $11,700 raise, or to help local governments fund other public needs, atenolol buy, or even to give taxpayers significant relief. Atenolol approved,
The picture in Oregon is both worse and worse. From 1992 to 2009 Oregon public school enrollment increased by 15 percent, while the number of teachers grew by 13 percent, canada atenolol. Oregon was one of only three states with an uptick in the student-teacher ratio, Atenolol prices, which is to say a decrease in the number of teachers relative to students. But during that same period, administrators and other non-teaching staff grew by 47 percent—more than three times as fast as student growth, buy atenolol without prescription. With slightly less enrollment growth than the national average, Oregon has managed to exceed the national average in non-teaching staff growth, cheap atenolol in canada.
If class size really does make a difference, and 37 years of teaching persuade me that it does, Oregon has been putting its limited education resources in the wrong place. Our student-teacher ratio has risen while our student-administrator ratio has dramatically fallen. Of course, it varies from one school district to another; but Oregonians in general should be asking why those who run our public schools have seen fit to increase their own ranks at three times the rate of growth in student enrollment while allowing for a small decline in the number of teachers relative to students.
A cynic might say the question answers itself.
Similar posts: Buy heartz small dogs without prescription. Buy lotensin without prescription. Buy eflora cream without prescription. Buy torsemide without prescription. Buy zometa without prescription. Buy actoplus met without prescription. Buy super zhewitra without prescription.
Trackbacks from: Buy atenolol without prescription. Prilosec online without prescription. Buy arimidex without prescription. Buy toprol xl without prescription. Buy diovan without prescription. Cephalexin online without prescription. Petcam oral suspension online without prescription.
Download PDF
If, in the 59 year span of the cited statistics, when pupil/teacher ratios declined from 27.5 to 15.4, reading scores declined and math scores remained level, how can you write that “…class size really does make a difference, and 37 years of teaching persuade me that it does”?
The core problem is political. We have increasing numbers of kids entering public schools that are less intelligent on average than kids were in 1950. I know it is un-PC to say this, BUT it is about race and the chaotic home environment of these same kids. Which is also a result of less intelligence and poor parenting in the homes of these same unruly and hard (to impossibe) to educate, kids. It is two sides of the same coin. Large numbers of these kids in any school guarantee an overall decline in the scholastic performance of the school, more staff to deal with mildly retarded kids and, of course, more cops in the hallways.
Public schools thus must deal with an issue that politicians and members of the social media refuse to admit exists. The attempt to thus equalize outcome in the K-12 public school system is truly Mission Impossible. The only permitted remedy is to keep bringing in more non-teaching, specialized staff and spend more money-per-pupil. Back east teachers are compelled (and caught) helping kids cheat on exams just in order that teachers, and administrators may keep their jobs.
It isn’t that bad in Oregon yet, but if the current trend in demographics persist, it soon enough will be and there is not a blessed thing that can be done about it except to spend the money and tweak the system.
I posted a link to this article at Facebook Beaverton Community for Education. There are several questions regarding this article. How are non-teaching staff defined? Does this include school counselors? Thanks. Feel free to visit the Facebook site to respond to questions. Thanks.