Testimony on SB 99 A: Requires Oregon Health Authority to establish Oregon Health Insurance Exchange as public corporation to be governed by board of directors

Before the House Committee on Health Care

by Steve Buckstein

Click Here for Audio (Steve begins at the 31:56 mark)

Co-Chair Greenlick, Co-Chair Thompson and members of the Committee, my name is Steve Buckstein. I’m Senior Policy Analyst and founder of Cascade Policy Institute, a non-partisan, non-profit public policy research organization based in Portland. Our mission is to promote policies that enhance individual liberty, personal responsibility and economic opportunity in Oregon.

I’m here today not to support or oppose SB 99 A, but to put on the record my concerns that if the state does enact an insurance exchange as envisioned in the bill, it should use the exchange as an opportunity to expand rather than restrict consumer choice.

As you may know, the U.S. House earlier this week voted to bar funding for state insurance exchanges. While this effort may very well fail, the Obama Administration took the vote as an opportunity to re-state its position that:

“Exchanges will allow Americans to compare prices and health insurance
plans and decide which quality, affordable option is right for them.”*

In order to make such decisions meaningful, Oregonians should have more insurance plan options than the state currently allows.  As I testified here on March 7th in favor of HB 2977, Oregonians should be allowed to purchase any policy offered in other states by companies licensed to sell insurance in those states. I’m sure that DCBS concerns about putting these companies on a level regulatory playing field with companies already approved to sell insurance in Oregon can be satisfied.

The exchange should also be open to approving new policies offered within Oregon that do not include all the current state mandates. Whatever decisions are made at the national level regarding the so-called “Essential Health Benefits” package, Oregon should be a leader in allowing our citizens as much choice as possible consistent with full disclosure. This will allow the exchange to satisfy the needs of consumers who want more affordable insurance choices as well as those who want more comprehensive coverage.

If the exchange does not offer such choices, it will quickly become part of the problem, both driving up costs and pushing more people out of the insurance marketplace.

In conclusion, I hope the exchange you envision is charged with helping to open up the insurance marketplace to more affordable plans, thus being be part of the solution.
Thank you, and I would be happy to take any questions.

* “House Votes to Bar U.S. Funding for Insurance Exchanges”, Bloomberg.com, May 4, 2011,

 

One Response to “Testimony on SB 99 A: Oregon Health Insurance Exchange as public corporation to be governed by board of directors”

  1. Cathryn June 8, 2011 at 7:34 pm #

    Mr. Buckstein,

    The insurance exchange bill passed today and I am looking forward to analysis of the bill by Cascade.I am however, not hopeful that the suggestions referenced above were taken into consideration given the political climate here in Oregon.

    Yet another reason to plan our exit – we are losing hope. We may be Idaho bound very soon.

Leave a Reply

 

Other Publications by Steve

June 1st Public Debate: Do Citizens in a Free Society Have a Right to Privacy in Charitable Giving?

Steve Buckstein | May 12, 2015
Do you donate to any nonprofit organizations such as charities, churches, or think tanks? Would you rather not be subject to possible retribution for supporting ...  read more

A Generational Mistake

Steve Buckstein | May 6, 2015
The Oregon Supreme Court last week struck down key 2013 legislative reforms to the Oregon Public Employee Retirement System (PERS) that would have saved taxpayers ...  read more

Government-Imposed Minimum Wage Increases Don’t Work for Oregon Small Businesses

Steve Buckstein | April 10, 2015
The concept that everyone should earn at least some government-mandated minimum wage is politically very appealing. It’s almost the classic example of taking from the ...  read more

More On These Topics

Make Medical Providers Compete on Price as Well as Quality

By Roger Stark, MD, FACS The method doctors and hospitals are paid for their work is undergoing gradual but relentless change. Providers traditionally have been ...  read more

Government-Imposed Minimum Wage Increases Don’t Work for Oregon Small Businesses

Steve Buckstein | April 10, 2015
The concept that everyone should earn at least some government-mandated minimum wage is politically very appealing. It’s almost the classic example of taking from the ...  read more

Oregon Children Deserve the Right to Try

Steve Buckstein | March 31, 2015
Oregon hopefully will join twelve states that have enacted Right to Try legislation, allowing terminally ill patients to try experimental drugs not yet approved by the ...  read more