Governor Kitzhaber is seeking to consolidate power over education. Early childhood, K-12 and post-secondary education would be overseen by a single board, the Oregon Investment Board.

Surprisingly, most of the education establishment approves of these changes, saying they will improve things at the ground level. Yet, how would shifting power upward improve educational outcomes for children at the bottom? For decades, we have tried that as the state and federal governments have gotten increasingly involved in our neighborhoods’ classrooms. Likewise, consolidating school districts to find savings and improve outcomes has not borne fruit.

But empowering individuals at the bottom – kids and parents – has made a world of difference to those on the ground level. Likewise, it has freed teachers to use their talents and passion to innovate at the classroom level. Choice programs like charter schools, vouchers and K-12 education tax credits have improved outcomes for kids, saved money and made parents happier in places like Milwaukie, Florida and Washington, D.C. Oregon parents, too, see the value of choice as waiting lists at local charter schools persist even as charter schools grow.

This issue boils down to your belief in freedom and governance. Do you believe a handful of elite individuals can determine best how to meet your children’s needs? Or do you believe that you know your children’s needs better than a distant group of bureaucrats?

 

2 Responses to “Is Kitzhaber’s Oregon Investment Board a Good Investment in Kids’ Education?”

  1. Donna April 14, 2011 at 10:21 pm #

    Don’t forget that SB 552 wants to designate the Governor as Superintendent of Public Instruction taking away the voice of the voter.for the Governor’s political agenda.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. FOX 31 Fair and Balanced on Education? We Report, You Decide Part Three | Education Policy Center - May 6, 2011

    [...] But most of the questions Stokols posed to the governor are largely predicated on some other parts of the School Cuts 101 series. Mainly first, should Colorado updated its school funding model based on an Oregon proposal that allots a share of dollars based on performance? (The idea has some merit in theory, but the Cascade State approach dangerously seeks to consolidate and centralize power.) [...]

Leave a Reply

 

Other Publications by Christina

Indiana Court Upholds School Choice Program, Invites Hope for Oregon’s Kids

Christina Martin | April 9, 2013
On March 26, the Indiana Supreme Court issued a unanimous opinion holding that the state’s Choice Scholarship Program is constitutional. Indiana’s voucher program is one ...  read more

Parent Power – Oregon’s Open Enrollment Law Puts Parents and Children First

Christina Martin | March 7, 2012
The 2012-2013 school year will be the first year that the new statewide open enrollment law takes effect. The new law (HB 3681) allows Oregon ...  read more

What does Oregon’s new open enrollment law mean for your child?

Christina Martin | February 15, 2012
WHAT THE LAW DOES The new statewide open enrollment law will take effect in the 2012–2013 school year. The new law allows Oregon parents to ...  read more

More On These Topics

Shouldn’t the Terminally Ill Have the “Right to Try” to Save Their Lives?

Cascade Policy Institute | October 22, 2014
Last Friday, Michigan approved Right to Try legislation with overwhelming bipartisan support. Colorado, Missouri, and Louisiana all passed similar measures this year, with Arizonans voting ...  read more

More Tax Dollars for College ― Or Prepare Students to Succeed There?

Steve Buckstein | October 16, 2014
Oregon voters are being asked this November to authorize spending more tax dollars to help some students afford an arguably unaffordable higher education. Measure 86 ...  read more

Dissing Online Education

Steve Buckstein | October 15, 2014
One can imagine that blacksmiths and buggy whip makers didn’t take kindly to the automobile revolution that started in the late 19th century. Those at ...  read more