Steve BucksteinQuickPoint!

Oregon food processors are the latest business interests flocking to Salem seeking tax relief to keep their industry afloat. They support two legislative bills that would give them tax credits to reduce the burden of their property taxes and seasonal labor costs. The processors argue Oregon’s high taxes and second highest minimum wage rate in the county leave them particularly vulnerable to foreign competition.

In this battle, both sides have valid points. Not just food processors, but many industries feel the pressure of high taxes and wage rates for unskilled labor. It’s perfectly understandable why they seek relief from such government imposed costs.

The other side is just as right to claim that singling out food processors for relief grants processors special treatment vis a vis every other business saddled with similar costs. Opponents will also likely argue that such relief amounts to little more than corporate welfare.

So, what should legislators do when faced with good arguments on both sides? They should understand that granting relief to specific industries amounts to picking winners and losers in the economy, a job they have no business doing. It’s not the way to make Oregon business-friendly.

Rather than grant selective relief, legislators should begin across-the-board removal of burdens they’ve already placed on business. Lower income and capital gains tax rates, reduce or repeal the minimum wage, and eliminate harmful regulations. Food processors would be less likely to ask for special treatment if Oregon treated all businesses as special.

Steve Buckstein is senior policy analyst at Cascade Policy Institute, a Portland, Oregon based think tank.

© 2006, Cascade Policy Institute. All rights reserved. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is hereby granted, provided the author and Cascade Policy Institute are cited. Contact Cascade at (503) 242-0900 to arrange print or broadcast interviews on this topic. For more topics visit the QuickPoint! archive.

 

Other Publications by Steve

Why Do City Leaders Keep Portland in the “Transportation Dark Ages?”

Steve Buckstein | December 9, 2014
In November, Beaverton, Gresham, Hillsboro, and Tigard joined Vancouver, Washington in welcoming ridesharing juggernaut Uber to operate legally in their cities. Last weekend, Uber began ...  read more

Portland Should Join the “Free World” of Ridesharing

Steve Buckstein | December 9, 2014
In November, Beaverton, Gresham, Hillsboro, and Tigard, Oregon joined Vancouver, Washington in welcoming ridesharing juggernaut Uber to operate legally in their cities. Conspicuously absent from ...  read more

The Governor’s Budget: Much More Than Beer Money

Steve Buckstein | December 3, 2014
Governor John Kitzhaber released his proposed 2015-17 budget this week. Critics were quick to argue that it’s either too much or too little, depending on ...  read more

More On These Topics

Portland’s Streetcar Audit: What Went Wrong?

Cascade Policy Institute | December 17, 2014
Last Thursday, auditors released a report questioning the Portland Streetcar’s performance. Ridership counts were inflated by 19%. Several additional metrics, including hourly vehicle operating costs ...  read more

Why Do City Leaders Keep Portland in the “Transportation Dark Ages?”

Steve Buckstein | December 9, 2014
In November, Beaverton, Gresham, Hillsboro, and Tigard joined Vancouver, Washington in welcoming ridesharing juggernaut Uber to operate legally in their cities. Last weekend, Uber began ...  read more

Portland Should Join the “Free World” of Ridesharing

Steve Buckstein | December 9, 2014
In November, Beaverton, Gresham, Hillsboro, and Tigard, Oregon joined Vancouver, Washington in welcoming ridesharing juggernaut Uber to operate legally in their cities. Conspicuously absent from ...  read more