Steve BucksteinQuickPoint!

Multnomah County voters just approved Oregon’s only local income tax, primarily to help schools. The 1.25 percent three-year tax is on top of Oregon’s already high 9 percent state income tax. Voters clearly value education, but this new money will largely benefit the teachers’ union, not the students. Rather than help the schools in a positive way, the new tax will allow the school system to avoid doing two things it must eventually do: control spending and become accountable for learning outcomes.

First, supporters of the new tax failed to recognize that school districts don’t have a budget shortfall so much as they have a spending problem. Giving districts more money will do nothing to correct their spending behavior. The Portland district, for example, had a real opportunity to curb out-of-control benefit costs during contract negotiations earlier this year. However, once the measure was proposed by Portland’s Mayor and Multnomah County’s Chairwoman, the school district board caved in and gave the teachers’ union virtually everything it wanted.

Second, with the passage of Measure 26-48, the teachers union got its wish: ever increasing funding without any connection to student learning. While audits may ensure that this new money goes into the classroom, nothing will stop existing school funds from flowing into administration or ever-growing employee benefits. The new tax is all about inputs. There is no accountability for learning outcomes.

So, voters did more than give the school system a new source of revenue. They rejected the opportunity to rein in costs and make the system accountable for student learning. Once again, the adults in the system came out winners, and the students came out losers.

Steve Buckstein is senior policy analyst at Cascade Policy Institute, a Portland, Oregon based think tank.

© 2006, Cascade Policy Institute. All rights reserved. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is hereby granted, provided the author and Cascade Policy Institute are cited. Contact Cascade at (503) 242-0900 to arrange print or broadcast interviews on this topic. For more topics visit the QuickPoint! archive.

 

Other Publications by Steve

Why Do City Leaders Keep Portland in the “Transportation Dark Ages?”

Steve Buckstein | December 9, 2014
In November, Beaverton, Gresham, Hillsboro, and Tigard joined Vancouver, Washington in welcoming ridesharing juggernaut Uber to operate legally in their cities. Last weekend, Uber began ...  read more

Portland Should Join the “Free World” of Ridesharing

Steve Buckstein | December 9, 2014
In November, Beaverton, Gresham, Hillsboro, and Tigard, Oregon joined Vancouver, Washington in welcoming ridesharing juggernaut Uber to operate legally in their cities. Conspicuously absent from ...  read more

The Governor’s Budget: Much More Than Beer Money

Steve Buckstein | December 3, 2014
Governor John Kitzhaber released his proposed 2015-17 budget this week. Critics were quick to argue that it’s either too much or too little, depending on ...  read more

More On These Topics

Report Shows No Return on Public Investment for Oregon Wave Energy Trust

John Charles | December 19, 2014
PORTLAND, Ore. – A new report released by Cascade Policy Institute concludes that the public-private partnership Oregon Wave Energy Trust has failed to achieve a ...  read more

Portland’s Streetcar Audit: What Went Wrong?

Cascade Policy Institute | December 17, 2014
Last Thursday, auditors released a report questioning the Portland Streetcar’s performance. Ridership counts were inflated by 19%. Several additional metrics, including hourly vehicle operating costs ...  read more

Why Do City Leaders Keep Portland in the “Transportation Dark Ages?”

Steve Buckstein | December 9, 2014
In November, Beaverton, Gresham, Hillsboro, and Tigard joined Vancouver, Washington in welcoming ridesharing juggernaut Uber to operate legally in their cities. Last weekend, Uber began ...  read more